I once knew a
racist. She probably doesn't think of herself as a racist, but that's what she
is. She turns her nose up at things that are excessively foreign to her. She
thinks Chinese restaurants are "sketchy." She considers every small
exposure to someone else's life as exposure to their whole culture; for
example, if she's talking to someone from Africa, she's talking to someone from Africa, not just talking to someone. So
it becomes a conversation about their culture instead of a conversation about,
you know, how are you, how's your day going? Instead of, how 'bout that cold
snap we're having, it's "do you get snow where you're from?" Once in
a while, fine, but when everything is
like that, it's racist. Just talk sometimes, you know? But so it is with
racists.
One day, this racist
I knew went to an all-inclusive resort in Costa Rica and decided that her time
in Costa Rica was demonstrative of great poverty and of how much better life is
in the United States. I'm not a fool; it's plain enough to see that there is
more wealth in the United States than there is in Costa Rica. But Costa Rica is
not poor. Many of its sleepy farming remind me of the farming towns I see along
the highways here in the States. It doesn't generally occur to me that people
with indoor plumbing, nice homes, nice cars, modern conveniences, good health
care, and so on, are poor. Like such farmers in the States, these Costa Rican
farmers and the people who live with them in their small towns, are mostly
middle class. Some are wealthy. Just like here.
It's easy to
understand why a racist would come out of Costa Rica thinking that she had just
seen great and terrible poverty. To someone who is biased against Central
American Spanish speakers, any evidence of a lack of American-style wealth is
proof of misery. This is nothing more than confirmation bias; she sees what she
wants to see, and what she wants to see is the superiority of her own
experience.
More difficult to
understand is why the racist I knew was unwilling or unable to see the
counterevidence in this particular case. The objective counterevidence is plain
enough. Costa Rica is a visually and environmentally stunning country, and
famous the world around for being so. Its green-patched rock cliffs falling off
into crystal clear water full of fish are the stuff of legend. One can
seemingly travel scarcely one hundred meters without seeing some kind of
monkey, coati, parrot, or sloth. Indeed, Costa Rican fauna isn't just cute,
it's the kind of fauna that makes people want to cuddle.
Oh, there are snakes and spiders, too, but those aren't the animals that
visitors tend to remember. The food is delicious, composed of fresh tropical
fruits, seafood pulled straight out of the ocean, mild spices and tender herbs,
and a few international finishing touches. The people are friendly,
well-spoken, calm, amiable, and healthy. Every inch of its surface is touched
by some form of outdoor sports, giving a visitor the impression that every
Costa Rican is an expert sportsman. The weather is virtually perfect.
Confirmation bias
would suggest that a racist would overlook such things and focus on the
negative. But in this case, all of Costa Rica's many strengths comprise the
very reason that the racist visited Costa Rica in the first place! If Costa
Rica weren't the paradise that it is, the racist I know never would have
visited it in the first place. There are more virginal ecologies, but their
lack of safe civilization makes traveling there too hazardous for an American
racist. There are better examples of great food and great outdoor fun, but none
with that kind amazing weather and environmental landscape.
I've quoted The Last Psychiatrist on such matters many
times before, and I'll do it again: Whenever a person entertains two opposing
thoughts at the same time, alternating variously, we have evidence of a defense
mechanism. Costa Rica makes me thankful to live
in America. I want to spend thousands of dollars and weeks at a time
experiencing Costa Rica. Which is it?
Sometimes racism is
simple and bald hatred of a scapegoated out-group. Other times, though, racism
is the last bastion of someone so insecure of her own superiority that anyone
else's excellence is an internal threat to her own sense of self.
At least, that's
what kind of racist she was.
No comments:
Post a Comment